Advertisement
  Home Friday, 03 July 2009 
Main Menu
 Home
 News
 FAQ
 C Source
 The Web Links
 Contact Us
 Administrator

Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?
No account yet? Create one

Statistics
OS: Windows
PHP: 5.2.7-dev
MySQL: 4.0.15-nt
Time: 21:04
Members: 535
Hits: 632861
News: 12
WebLinks: 6

Online Users
No Users Online

Newsflash
Host Extensions for IP Multicasting [RFC1112] specifies the extensions
required of a host implementation of the Internet Protocol (IP) to
support multicasting.  The multicast addressess are in the range
224.0.0.0 through 239.255.255.255. Current addresses are listed below. www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses

Welcome to the Frontpage
Internet Group Management Protocol Fails In A Radio LAN Environment  
Written by Administrator  
Saturday, 09 August 2008

Internet Group Management Protocol Fails In A Radio LAN Environment

To those that think IP Multicast works in a radio environment there is one little problem. IGMP is not a reliable protocol.  How IGMP attempts to gain reliability is by sending several copies of its messages. For example; the IGMP join group message will be sent several times, after all, isn’t it ok as long as the intended receiver of the IGMP message is aware of this “feature”. The problem is when it comes to the radio LAN environment packet loss is often so high that those little IGMP packets are often stepped on.

Last Updated ( Saturday, 09 August 2008 )
Read more...

FEC Alone won't do!  
Written by Administrator  
Tuesday, 31 July 2007

Why FEC alone won’t do!

Forward error correction is beginning to get some votes on the ipmulticast.com poll, but FEC alone can’t give us Reliable IP Multicast.  There are several reasons for this:

·         Latency – FEC or spread spectrum FEC is going to increase latency during channel changes.

·         Conspicuous consumption – In order to support a Radio LAN you have to send a LOT of FEC.  Like 10 times the data in a noisy situation. In a radio LAN environment packet out-of-order and packet loss drive consumption beyond acceptable levels.

·         Packet loss again – Yup', when your in a noisy environment, there aint' no' formula that accomplishes a perfect data transfer. There will always be a significant chance that the same redundant data will be lost multiple times.

·         If one dynamically scales FEC (as some have proposed) then a congested network will signal to send more FEC and hence a more congested network. Unless we do something as lame a stepping down to the lowest receiver in the network. 

So keep those thinking hats on because we aren’t quite there yet!

Sorry but FEC alone won’t do!

Ian A. Stewart
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 07 August 2007 )

A solution to the Multicast Problems?  
Written by Administrator  
Tuesday, 31 July 2007

We need a solution! 

We need a software-based solution for large-scale delivery of video (or data) on the Public Internet.

IP delivered linear channels are sprouting up, but how will they conquer the point to-point delivery problems associated with IP video?  Even Akamai’s huge and expensive “edge” delivery system, which uses the Internet Engineering Task Force’s Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP), is limited to about 300,000 simultaneous viewers.

The CBS March Madness sporting event is a detailed exploration of the point to-point video delivery problems and corresponding limitations.  Despite this event’s success at serving approximately 300,000 viewers, many more potential viewers were frustrated and had to wait in line. 

Stanford University professor, Steven Deering invented the system we need (thanks Steve),  but Deering’s specification – which he called “IP Multicast” – was not a reliable protocol (set of rules).  IP Multicast is prone to a percentage of data (or packet) loss.  Deering’s “IP Multicast” protocol was never intended to be a complete solution, just a “building block.”

The IETF has made an effort to design a scalable system for Reliable IP Multicast. Their best effort to date was originally called PGM, which stood for "Pretty Good Multicast."  Unfortunately, they have a separate group working on the Security and Reliability of the IP Multicast transmissions.  This has led to lack of interoperability between the Security and Reliability of the IETF’s systems; they are separate systems (proposals actually) creating lack of co-ordination and efficiency.  Hence, World Multicast came up with a new solution (and definition) – The Secure/Reliable IP Multicast.  By combining security and reliability into the same SMART process, we have increased efficiency and “interoperability.” 

  

So let's solve this in the field, where we can really test the ideas, let us wait no more for Mr. Big to give a thumbs up! If we do that, we are liable to get strapped helping the "cronies" get more market share!

 

Come on Troops! We can do it!

 

Ian A. Stewart

 

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 07 August 2007 )
Read more...

More...
Welcome to IP Multicast Standards Initiative
Presentations: TERENA gives
Polls
IP Multicast Reliability ....
Tree Based NAK
Tree Based ACK
Forward Error Correction
Somthing else...
  

Get the latest news
direct to your desktop
RSS

Browser Prefs
Add to Favorites
Make Home Page

Newsfeeds
Internet:Business News
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:58
Tim Morse promises to deliver positive results for shareholders amid Bartz's moves to simplify the company's structure.
Yahoo Taps New CFO as Reorg Continues
Even in the best economic times, green technologies face challenges. Can the chip industry help?
It's Not Easy Being Green (Tech)
With 2009 looking like a done deal, the research firm now expects recovery to begin at least a year from now.
Gartner: No Real Tech Recovery Until 2010
BBC: Technology
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:58
BBC News
A majority of tech workers in the public sector do not know about the emission reduction targets they face, says a survey.
Mixed results for green IT goals
Details emerge of why billions in virtual cash disappeared from a virtual bank in Eve Online.
Billions stolen in online robbery
The social networking site comes under fire for planned changes to privacy settings.
Facebook criticised over privacy

Most Read
Multicast Client Example
Multicast Server Example
Welcome to IP Multicast Standards Initiative
diewitherror.c Multicast Client & Server
What ipmulticast.com will provide

: Home :: News :: FAQ :: C Source :: The Web Links :: Contact Us :: Administrator :
powered by world multicast ietf rmt wg ietf rmt wg